ARTS2090: Final Essay

When publishing changes, so does society. We take a look into the impacts that the print press and 3D printing have had upon mankind…Publishing has been the revolution of communications ever since the birth of the printing press, whether it be the notion of it transcending language barriers or the dissemination of information, publishing technologies have undoubtedly changed the world. Print was the first reform to the history of printing and had contributed to human civilisation, “as we think of it as characteristic of the modern world economic, social, religious, political is built on the foundation provided by print as a medium of communication” (Finnegan 1978, p.96). As we enter into the modern digitalised world we realise that the very existence of mankind is supported by electronic publishing technologies that include the Internet and database-driven data. The ability to communicate with one and other as we see through history’s timeline of publishing has generated new civilisations of ideas and thoughts; it has blossomed into creative industries where we build upon other’s opinions. From education to politics, creative industries, science, entertainment and social relationship, it seems that almost every aspect of life has been shaped by publishing means.



Gutenberg’s first press industry changed the world forever
Image courtesy: Rosenblumtv

The main explosion of the renaissance movement had depended heavily upon the existence of the printing press. “Printing made it possible for the first time to publish hundreds of copies that were alike and yet might be scattered everywhere” (Sarton 1962). The first printed bible through Johannes Gutenberg’s printing press was in 1455, it was released in his hometown of Mainz, Germany. Gutenberg’s press was the catalyst and the beginning of a new modernised era. “Gutenberg’s invention made the soil from which sprang modern history, science, popular literature, the emergence of the nation-state, so much of everything which we define modernity” (Man 2002). Both society and culture changed when Gutenberg’s first Latin scriptures were released, it also was a fragmentation upon Christianity where many after the release had challenged the word the Roman Churches. Where the scriptures were once the consecrated property of the Church and monks, the first printed Latin Bibles allowed even commoners to have access to it. And for many, this was a first time for them that they had even read the Bible.

Subsequently we see the revolution in the church and the society; throughout history we have seen the impact that Gutenberg’s Bible brings. It had been the pinnacle of missionaries around the globe, accelerating the knowledge of faith for many from different corners of earth. Gutenberg’s experiment, his creation of the printing press in optimism to create a production line to produce fast and efficient text was the driving factor towards new books and new theories in society. During the early years of the Renaissance, the general population of Europe still had a low literacy level, the generation of new books and the lowering of costs of them allowed people to reverse this. Where once there was only spoken words as a means of communications the printing press allowed messages to be physically conveyed. We see the shift upon manuscript and print culture that has advocated for societal and intellectual change. “The printing press became and agent of change in the right place, at the right time” (Brannon 2007).


Mankind’s first published text: The Diamond Sutra

But from history we know that Gutenberg’s press wasn’t the first printing technique to be created. Decades before Gutenberg’s press even came to place, the Chinese were inventing printing methods from wooden blocks and movable porcelain methods, showing the maturity of their printing press. The image that you see above is known to be mankind’s first printed book, The Diamond Sutra created back in the year 868. The very sole invention of the printing and publishing existed in ancient Greek and China where there is evidence of transcription upon cloth and textiles. Whether it has made an impact on both in the West and East, the printing press and it’s publishments have shown evident impact upon the way in which information is shared and created.

Print culture, Eisenstein believes still has been the driving factors towards the changes and transformations we have seen in the Western society. We can see that the creative industries have also changed largely due to publishing. Without publishing technologies and the press there would be no way that the typography and font industry could even exist. “It is frequently stated that the Reformation would have been impossible or would have had little chance of popular acceptance without the rapid spread of typography” (Cole 1984). It is through these forms of publishing that we see the creative spheres boom, in example modern day communicative way of sharing data through ingenious info-graphs.


Mary Shelley’s novels changed the creative sphere of novels

Publishing had changed the world and ceaseless ideas had flooded upon books and novels. Creativity levels skyrocketed and books were soon becoming the driving factor to education. Perhaps one of the most well known of all novelists is Mary Shelley and her published: Modern Prometheus. Also known as Frankenstein, Shelley’s novel challenged the ideas of galvanism and viewpoints from the age of enlightenment and the Romantic Movement. The impact of printing made the rise of modern science possible alongside the impacts it had upon Protestant reformation. Without having prior publications towards galvanism and scientific discovery, Shelley’s imagination of Frankenstein’s monster wouldn’t have even existed.

It is perhaps what makes her one of the world’s most powerful female philosophers in English literature; Shelley’s works were made possible through printing press. She was allowed to transform her thoughts from pen to paper to one of the most read horror novels in history. Centuries later the different versions and creative adaptations of Frankenstein are seen through various games, novels and films. The creation of books had vast implications upon post and modern Europe, and with the generation of publicised novels, communications were shifting.  “The fact that identical images, maps and diagrams could be viewed simultaneously by scattered readers constituted a kind of communications revolution itself” (Eisenstein, 1982)


Publishing has generated a world where society is based around the nature of creation and sharing. We are able to create these creative spheres where we learn from each other’s contribution, whether that is in the form of music, art or even social relationships online.

When creative commons are created we generate the “possibilities for large numbers of people of diverse ideological stripes coming together to chart a new, more cooperative direction for modern society” (Walljasper, 2011). Taking into example, post and modern China would be a classic example of how publishing has changed society; new publishing changes build commons and have allowed new ideas to flourish into Chinese society since the end of the Cultural Revolution in 1976. The communist ideas that were once engraved into everyone through Mao’s vast published red book, was now changing through the Internet and self-publishing.

“You’re living the stream, adding to it, consuming it, redirecting it” (Guillaud, 2010)

In Modern China the focus of younger generation no longer lie in the classical books of the Cultural Revolution, they were now immersing themselves in the changes they saw around society. And thus we see the comparisons between their parents generation, where many had matured though the words of Mao. The Internet and even their modern day publishing industry showed a new cultural revolution. As we see it, this is the future of China. The idea of these common spheres is driving them to make a change. E-commerce, gaming industries, social media sites and even online banking were being embraced and integrated into every citizen’s life. The Chinese were finding freedom online and as Brannon describes “The power to publish resided right there on each desktop” (2007). Though the government’s Internet censorship laws still remained a strong force, citizens were still able to harvest their own means of social media such as Weibo, China’s very own version of Twitter. The creation of Weibo has not only be a creative sphere in itself, but the platform allows for sharing of music, images and topical news issues that spread a speed never seen before.

“Internet writing has been nothing short of a revolution for Chinese literature. It has allowed myriad voices to be heard. The digital landscape and technology have changed since the first wave of authors began to write; readers in China now access novels through smartphones and tablets rather than desktops” (Economist, 2013)

Now everyone was a publisher and the power didn’t just lie in the hands of the powerful. “That’s the greatest strength of the commons. It’s an inheritance shared by all humans, which increases in value as people draw upon its riches” (Walljasper, 2010). As the printing press industry in China continues to expand and enrich citizen’s minds, it is noted by Delmontage in his recent publication that:

“In contrast to most of the Western World, the printing industry in China is primed to be the world’s largest print market in the next several years. While   magazines, books and newspapers are in a state of decline in the West, the exact opposite is true in the world’s largest populated country” (Delmontage, 2013)

We see the long journey of publishing in China and it’s irrevocable impact towards citizen’s thoughts and ideas. From ancient wooden block methods to now even 3D printing, it has cultivated a fast moving society where ideas and creations never stop moving like their press. As we hear more news and updates surrounding the future of 3D publishing, how has it already changed our society and what will be the future for publishing technologies?


Just as printing pressed has shaped society, there is no doubt that the future of publishing is changing through 3D printing. 3D printing also known as additive manufacturing, allows using plastic or metal products to produce a printed out computer-designed model. The technological change will allow creative economies to boom.  Imagine a future where buildings could be printed, where designing of clothes and even food could be reshaped beyond our imagination.

“The new technology will be the first real challenge to the traditional top-    down economics of mass production for manufactured goods. 
This has already happened in the services sector and the digital world, with the rise of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, and the ability for self-publishing authors and music artists to sell directly to the public; now this decentralisation of power will also happen in manufacturing (Heath, 2013)


How will 3D printing change society?

With the rise of China’s consumer driven economy, 3D printing has drawn attention to the potential catastrophes it will have upon China’s manufacturing tycoons. Will 3D printing cause the downfall of their industrialised industries? Following this many issues still remain around 3D printing worldwide, in specifics in the US where the issue of illegal 3D printed items such as guns and weapons will be controversial. As 3D printing brings the next level of publishing, there are still fears that will be equipped for dangerous misuse in society.

3D printing has already started to change society and the way we think, it’s a matter of ‘watch this space’ to how governments and regulators will control the depth of it’s creative field. It is no doubt that throughout history, publishing technologies have shaped the stability our text and thoughts. It has generated unimagined products from the creative common, defining what Eisenstein saw as an Agent of Change.   Modern day publishing has made you the publisher. So are you ready for that publishing power that can change your society? Because it is already lying in your very own hands.


Brannon, B 2007, ‘The Laser Printer as an Agent of Change’ in Baron. Sabrina et al., (eds.) Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press: p.353-364

Cole, R 1984, “Unsung Heroes: Sixteenth Century Journal” Autumn 1984, p. 327-33, Roosevelt U Library, Chicago

CS, M 2013, “Voices in the Wilderness”, The Economist, accessed 11th of June 2013,

Eisenstein, E 1979, “Defining the initial shift: some features of print culture” in The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, Vol 1, p.43-163, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England

Eisenstein, E 1982, “The Printing Press as an Agent of Change” in Communication and Cultural Transformations in Modern Europe, vol 1-2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

Evans, D 1998, “A critical examination of claims concerning the impact of print”, ABER, accessed 10th of June 2013,

Finnegan, R 1978, “Communication and Technology” in Open University Course D101, Making Sense of Society, Unit 8, Block 3, Communication p.96

Guillaud, H 2010 “What is implied by living in a world of flow?” accessed 10th June 2013,,

Health, A 2013, “3D printing: the new, bottom-up industrial revolution, The Telegraph, accessed 11th of June 2013,

Macmillan, 2012, “Print preview: The printing press changes the world, three dimensional printing could do the same, Volume 487, p.6-7, Macmillan Publishers Limited, Australia

Man, J 2012, “Gutenberg: How One Man Remade the World with Words”, John Wiley and Sons, New York

Ransom, H 2013, “History: The Gutenberg Bible”, The University of Texas at Austin, accessed 11th of June 2013,

Sarton, G 1962, “The Quest for Truth: Scientific Progress During the Renaissance” In the Renaissance: Six Essays, Metropolitan Museum Symposium, New York

Walljasper, J 2010 “All That We Share”, Yes Magazine, accessed 10th of June 2013,

Walljapser, J 2011 “The Commons Movement is Now”, Common Dream, accessed 10th of June 2013,


Are we aggregating aggregation?

"Artificial intelligences will become the keepers of the digital sphere" (Dodson, 2009)

“Artificial intelligences will become the keepers of the digital sphere” (Dodson, 2009)

If you think we are living in a fast paced world, its online counterpart is moving even faster. It is an online revolution which is exponentially growing and there has been an estimate that nearly 4.6 BILLION webpages exist (WorldWideWebSize, 2013). With the constant construction of platforms and applications that meets our problems, our cultivation practices of distributing and aggregating information are leading to all sorts of new and developed social forms. Is this ideal situation really what it seems like though? Or is mankind aggregating the existence and development of the internet.

“You’re living the stream, adding to it, consuming it, redirecting it” (Guillaud, 2010)

Aggregation, Publishing and Distribution ideas all seamlessly entwine with each other as the basis of this Publics and Publishing course. During the course, we have also been involved in a production of information aggregation, synthesising ideas, thoughts and opinions into our publishing spheres. It is probably embedded as first nature and characteristics of Gen Y users. To be constantly adding new information and contributing to these 4.6 billion pages online, is a form of personalisation through aggregation. But is this really an advantageous contribution to the Internet?

“At a time when obstacles to distribution are collapsing, the act of distribution become much less important than the act of consumption” (Guillaud, 2010)

Guillaud continues to explore the reworking of the distribution structures in internet technologies. Not only are there new forms of these distribution methods in the internet, but a new form of cultural structure in information aggregation has also emerged. With the possibility of Web 2.0, we have established a new form of culture through these social media aggregation platforms. Taking for example,Twitter, would the possibility of trolls and keyboard warriors have existed 10 years ago? Or maybe the formation of Instagram. Man’s creation to satisfy our burning vanity to show off our #duckfaces and that 5 star meal on that luxurious paradise island holiday (which should really be spent away from all forms of technology).  Although we are living, breathing and contributing to the formation of digital information and spheres, I personally think that we are heading towards plateau in the significance of information distribution.


“We have reached a point where that separation no longer exists, as once-precious data tend toward low value ubiquity” (Dodson, 2009)

Forms of social media aggregation and distribution


Publishing, Aggregation and distribution may be able to coexist but there will be many unsolvable effects that will soon come with the new way we choose to deliver and share information. Unless of course we again create new social forms that will answer these problems… it is a never-ending cycle. To the left is a briefing of our social media forms. What are your views with these social forms being the calling to all our problems?



  1. Dodson, W 2009 “Dawn of the Systems Age”,, accessed 21 May 2013.

  2. Guillaud, H 2010 “What is implied by living in a world of flow?”,, accessed 21 May 2013.

  3. Hayes, G 2008 “The Social Media Campaign”,, accessed 21 May 2013.

  4. Kunder,M 2013 “The Size of the World Wide Web (The Internet),, accessed 21 May 2013.


We are all ubiquitous. It sounds like an amazing super power to possess but being ubiquitous is present in all factors of our lives, it is intrinsically linked to our digitalised world. Without the omnipresence of computers there would be no possible form to support our existing civilisation , there would be no form of effective communication, economy or even forms of distribution.

 “Shows us the ubiquitous wireless connectivity of our lives,”(Murphie, 2013)

Ubiquity is a correlative term to online publishing thanks to the power of the internet. Your personal identity can span across to several others, that being a Facebook user, an Instagram user, an online banking profile, a personal blogger, an online shopping buyer and even an online dating site user.

Internet of Everything will provide richer experiences, new capabilities, and unprecedented economic opportunity for businesses, individuals, and nations (Johnston, 2012)

These days, the control of information publishing is at the tip of our hands, it has increased mobility and also cyber spatiality. While you could be purchasing something from a Japanese boutique shop on one tab, you could be all the way in Hawaii booking your next trip in another. This is simply the ubiquitous power that the Internet Age has given us.

“The web enables infinite distribution of content without any special effort or infrastructure (Zawodny, 2004)

RRS feeds

RSS feeds: The possibility of ubiquity

However the ubiquitous nature of the internet also has its downfalls. Where you as a user could have a copious amount of presence on one site, other sites suffer to make prominence. The possibility of ubiquity of the internet would be through the way in which RSS allows users to access information and sources in their own time. Zawodny describes this as a sense of freedom to access whatever data that you like which is rare for companies to grant you. It empowers us with a sense of ownership that in hand “helps builds some of the most loyal, passionate and vocal supporters…some of them will put your data to work in ways you never dreamed of” (Zawodny, 2004). That in reference to the successful companies and programs such as Bill Gate’s Microsoft, that was becoming ubiquitous and powerful.

In comparison, Google’s presence has becoming increasingly more ubiquitous mirroring the past of Gate’s Microsoft. Google has taken the advantage of opened and cross platformed technologies. First it was the humble Google search, to the RSS feeding Google Reader, dominating the Android phone platform and now even creating the “next big thing” with the Google glass.

“Allows Google to capitalize on a future dominated by people using multiple devices and operating systems (Mott, 2013)

Mott further elaborates and questions the intention of Google, referring its ubiquitous presence in our community not to something that is philanthropic. “Google isn’t some beneficent magician that builds wonderful products and improves the Web without expecting anything in return” (Mott,2013). His warning about confusing Google’s ubiquity for openness can be read further on this link “Don’t confuse Google’s ubiquity for openness”.

In hindsight, being ubiquitous  is probably a trait that every company and person would want to possess (also because sounds like an amazing superpower to have). The Ubiquitous power is in the palm of your hands, or if all else fail I will leave you with the video below, Mozilla’s Ubiquity extension.  (Yes, there is a program out there for this too, not a surprising resort for people living in the 21st century, #first world problems).


  1. Johnston, J 2012, “How The ‘Internet of Everything’ Will Transform the World,, accessed 13th May 2013
  2. Mott, D 2013, “Don’t confuse Google’s ubiquity for openness”, accessed 13th of May 2013
  3. [Lecture slides] Murphie, A 2013, “Visual, perception, politics”, lecture notes distributed in ARTS2090 at the University of New South Wales, on 13 May 2013,
  4.  [Video] Yanzilme, 2008, “Ubiquity Demo”,, accessed 13th of May 2013
  5. Zawodny, J 2004, “Ubiquity in the Internet Age,, accessed 13th May 2013.

Commons: sharing is caring

Commons have been the way of life in which humans have been establishing upon for centuries, it is the foundation of our society. They bring beneficial richness to all individuals and can be seen all around us, ranging from nature, education, the Internet and yes even that public ‘common’ toilet.

             “That’s the greatest strength of the commons. It’s an inheritance shared by all humans, which increases in value as people draw upon its riches” (Walljasper, 2010)

More recently 21st century ‘commons’ have become a prevalent issue, this is increasing due to the free publishing rights the Internet commons allow to citizens. Walljasper describes these commons-based societies to ensure and “offer considerable appeal for progressives after a long period in which the bulk of their political engagement has been in reaction to right-wing initiative”(Walljasper, 2010)

No doubt the most eminent case of a commons sphere was back in 2009, with the heightened coverage over WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks was heavily debated over the shared political commons it had created, it  allowed everyday citizens or “commoners” to have an upper hand over the corruption that was happening around them. Although seemingly controversial and slain by many governments, isn’t WikiLeaks for the better of the citizens. Their goal clearly has one objective that is based around an integral factor of shared commons, which is “to bring important news and information to the public” (WikiLeaks, 2013).

Aside from the internet trolling that the internet has created, George Monbiot further discusses the need to start regaining cyber commons due to the organised and even trained army of trolls that are endangering global commons. He has described the presence of the internet to be a “remarkable gift, which has granted us one of the greatest democratic opportunities since universal suffrage” (Monbiot, 2010)

These benevolent traits that WikiLeaks have shown encompasses the Commons Framework deduces by the website On the Commons, a website founded in 2001 to draw attention to the commons movement. The visual also correlates to the important issues of internet commons we are facing in todays society.

Commons Framework (OntheCommons,2012)

Commons Framework : Commons exist all around us (OntheCommons,2012)

“Commons is a conservative as well as progressive virtue because it aims to conserve and nurture all those things necessary for creating a better world” (On the Commons, 2012)

When we reflect onto some of the most prevalent benefits from a commons-based society, I would possibly argue that the music industry has one of the most congealed networks of common interests. It is how the music industry strives to work and function, by the influences of others around us and the sharing of thoughts and ideas. Hiphop would not even be an existing genre without the influences  of soul, old school rock and roll and even a bit of funk. And more recently with the uprise of social media, publishing platforms such as SoundCloud and Spotify have indefinitely shaped the electro, house and trance communities. The modern music society is based around the nature of creation and sharing. Creative commons such as these create “possibilities for large numbers of people of diverse ideological stripes coming together to chart a new, more cooperative direction for modern society” (Walljasper,2011)

Music commons

“SoundCloud is not only about sharing sounds by also about sharing common interests, attitudes, goals and connective with people who share your passion” (SoundCloud, 2013)

commonsCommons is the way of sustainability for the future. The more the sharing the more the caring and thus is beneficial to the established and pre-existing commons.

“Our future depends on our commons and each of us as commoners. We all have a mutual responsibility to name, claim, protect and equitably manage what belongs to all of us for today and future generations” (On the Commons, 2012)


  1. Good, R 2010 “From Open Business Models To An Economy Of The Commons, Master New Media, accessed 17th of April 2013,
  2. Reader, U 2010 “A New Political Dawn: The Push for a Commons-Based Society”, accessed 16th of April, 2013,
  3. Monbiot, G “Reclaim the Cyber-Commons”, accessed 17th of April 2013,
  4. Walljasper, J 2010 “All That We Share”, Yes Magazine, accessed 16th of April 2013,
  5. Walljapser,J 2011 “The Commons Movement is Now”, Common Dream, accessed 16th of April 2013,

Braintrain 101 : Infotention

It is all too often that our attention lays in astonishment at people in lecture halls. We HAVE ALL seen it before. People on their laptops with endless tabs sprawled across their browser, jumping from Facebook to internet shopping, news articles, Skype and even the stockmarket watch. The sheer level of multitasking expertise that users of the technological world have today should be considered as a serious and deadly skill…


It is this skill possession, the form of mental training and digital literacy, that is the basis to Howard Rheingold’s term- Infotention. 

“Infotention is a combination of attentional disciplines and information handling tools, a methods for turning information overload to knowledge navigation” (Rheingold, 2013) 

Augmented information that has resulted from growing cyber-commons on the internet have created a problematic issue, where most users are not able to differentiate clearly between the overload of information and the need to know. With the multitude of technological platforms that we have, we have evolved our brains to become a powerful network to switch between tasks.

 “Personal technologies today are prosthetics for our minds” (Stone, 2012) 

I, myself am often shocked to find the horrendous amounts of applications I have opened on my Iphone within the matter of minutes. And although it is easy for me to switch back and forth from Facebook, Instagram and the trending news headlines, I find that I do not possess the skill anymore to focus my attention to solely one application.

Evidently James Temple’s article: All those tweets, apps, updates may drain brain, addressed the growing nature of why our generation has such appalling long term memory and mental performance, as pinpointed by scientist at the University of California and San Francisco.

Infotention is our salvation from what psychiatrists have called “addict-like behavior when it comes to technology, unable to ignore its pull, even when it negatively affects them (Temple, 2011). And through this form of brainwork, and brain training redeem back our cognitive and attention limit.

“It’s that too few have learned and taught to others the skills we need to know if we are to master the use of our attention amid a myriad of choices designed to attract us.  A significant part of the population has not yet learned to decide when it is appropriate to share multiple lines of attention and when single focal point is necessary” (Rheingold 2012, p.15)

A simple wrap up of Rheingold’s: Infotention

Infotention mindmap, Photo: Gigi Chan

Joyce Valenza of the School Library Journal also summarises her experience in the problematic issues with multitasking and attention here in her article, Infotention and digital citizenship. (Click here for the link)


1.  Rheingold, H. (2012) “Net Smart: How to Thrive Online”, MIT press, United States of America

2. Stone, L (2012) “Conscious Computing,, accessed 12 April 2013

3. Temple, J (2011) “All those tweets, apps, updates may drain brain”,, accessed 12 April 2013

4. Valenza, J (2012) “Infotention and digital citizenship”, ,accessed 12 April 2013

Archives: A desire


“There would be no archive desire without the radical finitude, without the possibility of a forgetfulness which does not limit itself to repression” (Derrida, 1997)

When someone asks you what your deepest desire is, most would probably say love, money and other things towards that tangent. The last thing that would even come into mind would be something like “my deepest heart desires are archives”, unless you’re like a prodigal archivist such as Julian Assange . Archives are defined in our reflections from this week as  a form of storing any sort of information so that we may be able to use it for later use. So why am I even relating archives and desires in the same sentence you may ask? 

It’s a pretty simple concept to link the two terms archives and desire together. Archives are like a mans desire, our own made creation, that allows  us to store information that may be beneficial to our later use. In the case of one of the most disputable archives that exist to date, Wiki Leaks, was it not Julian Assange’s own desire to expose secret documents from governments to the public? And in more relevant Gen Y terms, is your Tumblr account or even your YouTube subscription list not the composition of your most desired people or things?

“Archives is also a place of dreams. To enter that place where the past lives, where ink on parchment can be made to speak, still remains the social historians dream of binging to life those who do not for the main part exist” (Steedman, 2002) 

Since man needed a place to store such thoughts, information and desires the archive was born. Well…not exactly along those lines but when we come to think of the archives that we have made in the recent years, such applications like Pinterest and Twitter sure do represent archive desire. Below is the example of an archive where our most wanted and desirable things are placed, this personalised database (which is also a form of archives) allows for sharing and seeking other users inspirations. Pinterest is such a versatile form of sharing and creating our own databases that it has to date, over 48.7 million users, with 83% of them being female. Archival fever for women and their love towards shoes , clothes and more shoes.


Without archives the very basis of publishing would not even be able to exist as its structure is the backbone to where we store our thoughts and ideas. The media construct archives around us every day and also destroy others (Derrida, 1997). Our ability to engage with publishing also is also due to the very existence of archives, where we store our music, or what playlists that we create is a spectral formation of the information that we long. The future and structure of archives are defined as being spectral, it is almost a spontaneous action that is the basis to how we live and function. Archives are what we sustain on , even in terms of the formation of laws, the concepts of theories to the way that we organise information on our supermarket shelfs.

“It is to have a compulsive, repetitive, and nostalgic desire for the archive, and irrepressible desire to return to the origin” (Derrida,1997) 


  1. Enszer, J (2008), ‘Archive Fever” A Freudian Impression by Jacques Derria’ Blogspot,, accessed 1 April 2013

  2. Howard, S 2007, ‘Reposted: Archive fever (a dusty digression)‘, Early Modern Notes, , accessed 1 April 2013 

The A.N.T


“What seems to be Technical, is partly Social; and what seems to be Social, is partly technical”  (Delukie, 2009)

The relationship between publishing and publics is a balanced equilibrium, where they are both the actants of changes and shifts in our society. However it is not as simple as it is made to sound, as there is a complex assemblage between both publishing and media. There is much debate to whether it is the social or technical factors that have been the ongoing agents of the changes in publishing networks. To avoid a ‘which came first the chicken or the egg’ situation, the Actor-Network Theory suggested by Bruno LaTour et al. attempts to use a sociological theory to explain it all.

To condense and summarise here is a short but concise “For Dummies” A.N.T video

The video delves deeper into the theory defining all factors , whether it be animate or inanimate, to have some contribution into the network that it exists in. This is known as the Principle of generalised symmetry. The A.N.T is a rather inclusive theory that associates all factors as a actant with a same degree of agency, it integrates it all to the same conceptual framework.

Looking back into the relationship between publics and publishing, we can see that it coexists in somewhat of a heterogeneous network like the Actor-Network theory. From the moment you purchase a book, all the factors from the pages, the buyer, the cashier, the seller and even the bookstore are considered as an equal agency. One without the other will cause a disorder in our structured actor network between the publisher and the buyer.

What I can take away from the Actor-Network theory , in the attempt to understanding more about the assemblages between publics and publishing is to look at it from a different perspective. Where each and every factor plays a part to form the relationships between publishing and the social.


1. Delukie 2009,  Khaki Films, ‘Actor-Network Theory In Plain English’, YouTube,, accessed 25 March 2013

2. Wade, 2005, ‘Actor-Network Theory’, York University,, accessed 25 March 2013

ABC easy as 123

“Ways of managing knowledge and verbalization in primary oral cultures” (Ong, 1982)

It amazes me of how extraordinary the human brain is functioned to work, especially how man developed language to communicate with one another. Although orality and writing do not fall together synonymously, it was the first step to changing how we transmitted ideas between each other.  The translation of thoughts onto paper have inevitably changed the world of publishing forever.

Oral speech becomes spontaneous from our first words as child, our brains suddenly churn away and absorb each and every single word we hear, forming it into exquisite languages. Then we progress for a few years blabbering on with our motormouths, until kindergarten where we learn the ABC of the alphabet. This is the case for phonetic languages such as English. For my poor unfortunate soul, I was born into a family where 2 languages exist together. Except one does not have an alphabet. I grew up with Chinese as my first language and english as my second, but it has slowly worked its way around. Although I can speak fluently in the language, there is a struggle to actually write to communicate with others due to its logo syllabic nature. On top of this , I was also born into the electronic age…

“Electronic age is also an age of secondary orality in phones, radio , television” (Ong, 1982) 

We have been so immersed into integrating technology into our lives that it has developed many new languages. That be of html coding, leetspeek, text messaging acronyms, all of these have been a communication revolution. However we have also been sensitized to the previous contrast been orality and writing, as technology has taken over in a form of print (Ong,1982). Without being able to know these languages, you will start to struggle with the very means of communication in this era, many older generations are conforming to learn TXT speech and using the internet. There has been cases where lingo has even been bleeding into school paper essays as teacher Mike Kliener describes it as no shock to him, kids these days are just using their thumbs to communicate to each other. 

As we progress further into this new form of publishing electronically will we see further transcending language barriers being developed to make it more effective (Brannon, 2007). 

In the meantime I will leave you with this article that will change the way you think about knowing the alphabet A-Z back to front.


1. Ong, W 1982, ‘Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the world’, Methuen, New York

2. Brannon, B 2007, ‘The Lazer Printer as an Agent of Change’ in Baron. Sabrina et al., (eds.) Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press: p.353-364

3. Harshman, M 2011, ‘OMG! textspeak in schoolwork ;-)’, The Columbian,, accessed 15 March 2013


Week 2

“Print created the very notion of science: … the way humankind conceived of politics, of religion, of philosophy, of knowledge itself” (Brannon, 2007) 

Reading a book is becoming nostalgic to me as to many other fellow Gen Y friends. It is sad to think that children being born in this day and age will probably forget what it is like to have their parents read story books to them, on actual books.

“Spoken words would be conveyed by printed messages without being replaced by them”  (Eisenstein, 1979)

E-Reading has slowly been assimilated into our lives with the advancement of technological change. It took the Amazon Kindle 3 years with its Ebooks to surpass the sale of paper back novels, is this the vision and future of what publishing will become? These days cook books are slowly being replaced by recipes on food blogs, while newspapers are shifted onto tablets, books itself are simply a click and download away. There is no doubt that E-Reading has bought much convenience into our lives, but it is different and incomparable to the presence of a classic novel on your bookshelf.

Digital publishing is becoming the new age of the Print revolution, just as “printing press became an agent of change in the right place, at the right time” (Brannon, 2007). We have had a revolutionary evolution from ancient scrolls, Guttenberg’s printing, laser jet printers to the current forms of digital publications. It has opened up new market opportunities where everyone in a sense is a publisher where all our thoughts and information merge into one big network where information is shared seamlessly through a Control+V, likes or shares.

“In the digital world, the role of publishers will be larger as new technologies provide for an even greater user and learning experience” (Ruppel, 2010)

Where we often hear a big hype about the future of E-books being the death of books, it is digitalisation that is the becoming the pinnacle of our publishing in the 21st century. Ephemerality of digital media as Brannon (2007) suggests may not necessarily be the death of publishing itself. Books won’t be as we know it in the near future but can only get better with time as their digital cousins undergo many makeovers over time. Perhaps even as this video suggest we may lean back towards the more simple, wire free, long-lasting option.


  1. Einsenstein, E 1979, ‘Defining the initial shift: some features of print culture’ in The Printing Press as an Agent of Change Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: p.43-163
  2. Brannon, B 2007, ‘The Lazer Printer as an Agent of Change’ in Baron. Sabrina et al., (eds.) Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press: p.353-364
  3. Ruppel, P 2010, ‘5 E-Book Trends That will Change the Future of Publishing’, Mashable,, accessed 10 March 2013
  4. Morgan, N 2012, ‘What is the Future of Publishing’, Forbes,, accessed 11 March 2013